Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Sunday
May 14
10:30 - 11:30
Schubert
Translational outputs from clinical trials
Chloe Brooks, United Kingdom;
Jens Overgaard, Denmark
2200
Proffered Papers
Interdisciplinary
11:00 - 11:10
Treatment planning compliance rates in paediatric clinical trials: preliminary report from QUARTET
Sarah Kelly, Belgium
OC-0422

Abstract

Treatment planning compliance rates in paediatric clinical trials: preliminary report from QUARTET
Authors:

Sarah Kelly1,2,3, Andrada Turcas2,4,5, Coreen Corning2, Tom Boterberg6, Lorenza Gandola7, Mark Gaze8, Gail Horan9, Laetitia Padovani10, Henry Mandeville11,12

1European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE), QUARTET Project, Brussels, Belgium; 2European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Data Management, Radiotherapy Quality Assurance, Brussels, Belgium; 3Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent, Belgium; 4European Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE), QUARTET Project, Brussels, Belgium; 5University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; 6Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent, Belgium; 7Fondazione IRCCS-Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Department of Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy; 8University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Oncology, London, United Kingdom; 9Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oncology Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 10Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Department of Radiation Oncology, Marseille, France; 11The Royal Marsden Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sutton, United Kingdom; 12Institute of Cancer Research, -, Sutton, United Kingdom

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

The QUARTET Project provides radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) for European paediatric clinical trials: encompassing site approvals prior to trial participation as well as treatment plan evaluation. The main goal of the project is to provide prospective individual case review (ICR) of planning data, allowing error correction prior to treatment delivery, thereby improving patient tumour control and quality of life outcomes. Here we present the early experience of ICR submission, exploring number of cases submitted, ICR outcomes, and any patterns in causes of non-compliance.


Material and Methods

Radiotherapy guidelines for each individual trial define the specific data upload requirements for an effective ICR. DICOM diagnostic and planning images, structure sets, plan, and dose files are uploaded to the QUARTET web-based platform where they are processed and sent for review. Expert clinicians and physicists perform a plan evaluation against protocol requirements. Possible evaluation outcomes are: Per Protocol, Acceptable Variation, Unacceptable Variation, or Justified Variation. All ICR submissions and outcomes are tracked for individual trials; submissions between 01/05/2016 and 09/10/2022 were collated and analysed for the purpose of this report.

Results

For six QUARTET-affiliated trials, a total of 255 cases from 15 countries have been submitted to the platform for ICR. ICRs have been completed prospectively for 125 patients. retrospectively for 119 patients, and 11 further reviews are underway. Figure 1 demonstrates the increasing number of submissions over time, with the rising number and proportion of prospective plan reviews. The total, initial plan rejection rate is 97/243 cases (39.9%), however, it should be noted that this varies significantly depending on the trial/tumour site complexity. Proportion of plan rejections are broadly similar between prospective and retrospective case reviews (39.2% v 40.7%) but again vary by trial. The main singular cause of plan rejection is target delineation (22%), however 80% of plan rejections have at least two protocol violations (also see Figure 2). Unacceptable dose variations are more often associated with retrospective reviews due to propagation of error from incorrect (target) delineation.


Conclusion

There is clear indication of planning variations in paediatric radiation oncology. Despite comprehensive RTQA guidelines, a significant number of plan rejections occur. This preliminary report underlines the importance of prospective plan review. QUARTET will continue to provide RTQA for paediatric clinical trials in Europe and expand education and practice-sharing initiatives to better support institutions to produce high-quality treatment plans, benefitting those participating and outside of clinical trials.