Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Saturday
May 13
10:30 - 11:30
Strauss 2
Tumour-specific innovations
Michèle Keane, Switzerland;
Yat Man Tsang, Canada
1260
Proffered Papers
RTT
11:10 - 11:20
The Role of a Radiopaque Hydrogel Spacer in Image-Guidance for Prostate Stereotactic Radiotherapy
Oded Icht, Israel
OC-0127

Abstract

The Role of a Radiopaque Hydrogel Spacer in Image-Guidance for Prostate Stereotactic Radiotherapy
Authors:

Oded Icht1, Shir Schlosser1, Yosef Landman1, Mor Rephael1, Assaf Moore2, David Silvern1, Dimitri Bragilovski2, Dror Limon1, Elisha Fredman1

1Davidoff Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Petah Tikva, Israel; 2Davidoff Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Petah Tikva, Israel

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Precise patient positioning with image guidance (IGRT) is essential for safe prostate stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) delivery. We evaluated the potential of a CT-visible hydrogel spacer to serve as a surrogate fiducial marker for prostate IGRT.

Material and Methods

Prior to planning prostate SABR, patients underwent placement of three intraprostatic gold markers for alignment and a SpaceOAR VueTM (SOv) to decrease rectal radiation dose, per standard practice. At treatment, table shifts based on cone-beam CT (CBCT) to the planning CT were initially performed by 3-dimensional alignment of the SOv (experimental arm), then again based on the fiducial markers (standard arm). The six directional shifts (three linear and three rotational) were recorded and the differences compared.

Results

140 fractions across 41 consecutive patients were evaluated. Mean/median differences between SOv-based and fiducial-based alignment in linear (vertical, longitudinal, lateral) and rotational (rotation, pitch, roll) shifts were 0.9/0.6mm, 0.8/0.5mm, and 0.6/0.4mm, and 0.38/0, 0.62/0, and 0.35/0 degrees, respectively (table 1). Gland volume did not correlate with shift differences. A learning curve was observed, with significantly less variability between alignment methods in the second half of fractions studied (n=70) compared to the first half in five of the six axes – vertical (p=0.0032), longitudinal (p=0.0464), pitch (p<0.0001), roll (p<0.0001), and rotation (p<0.0001) (Table 1). Further, in the latter 70 fractions, no differences between alignment methods were recorded in 94.3%, 92.9%, and 92.7% of the three rotational shifts.


Conclusion

For precise IGRT in prostate SABR, daily alignment with a readily visible SpaceOAR VueTM was highly comparable to intraprostatic gold fiducial markers, with an observed rapid learning curve. Utilizing a single device for a dual purpose may increase procedural efficiency, decrease risk, and lower cost, warranting further prospective study.