Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Monday
May 15
10:30 - 11:30
Business Suite 1-2
Pelvic cancers
Li Tee Tan, United Kingdom
3270
Poster Discussion
Clinical
Inflammatory markers to predict neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in rectal cancer patients
Hilal Alkış , Turkey
PD-0815

Abstract

Inflammatory markers to predict neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in rectal cancer patients
Authors:

Hilal Alkış1, Gülşah Özden1, Zilan Başkan1, Melisa Bağcı Kılıç1, Hatice Kübra Gündüz1, Aleksei Kornienko1, Bennur Zeynan Devran1, Mustafa Adlı1

1Marmara University, Radiation Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Pretreatment inflammatory markers obtained from the complete blood count (CBC) can be predictive for treatment response in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between inflammatory markers and treatment response in rectal cancer patients treated with NACRT.

Material and Methods

A total of 192 rectal cancer patients treated with NACRT were included in the study. Male/female ratio was 1.59. Clinical T stage was T2 in 13 patients, T3 in 162, and T4 in 17. Clinical N stage was N0 in 25 patients, N1 in 160, and N2 in 7. Radiation dose was 50-56 Gy to the primary tumor and 45-50.4 Gy to the regional lymph nodes. All patients received concurrent capecitabine (n=191) or 5-fluorouracil (n=1). Patients with no evidence of residual disease on DRE, MRI, and endoscopic evaluation following NACRT were determined as clinical complete responders. Patients with clinical (n=34) or pathological (n=27) complete response were classified as complete responders (CR) and the other response groups as non-complete responders (nCR) (n=131). Pretreatment absolute values of neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), monocytes (M), and platelets (P), plateletcrit (PCT), mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were recorded as hematological inflammatory markers. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare the variables between the groups.

Results

Median age was 60 (18-86) years. Mean N, NLR, PLR, L, and LMR are given in the Table. Pretreatment N (p=0.042), NLR (p=0.001), and PLR (p=0.002) were significantly higher, while L (p=0.015) and LMR (p=0.004) were lower in nCR group compared to CR group. Pretreatment M, P, PCT, and MPV did not have any effect on the treatment response. 

Table. Mean (± SD) N, L, NLR, PLR, and LMR values according to treatment response.

Markers

CR

nCR

P value

Neutrophil (10³/µL)

4.65 ± 1.41

5.21 ± 1.70

0.042

Lymphocyte (10³/µL)

2.86 ± 4.85

1.99 ± 0.71

0.015

NLR

2.27 ± 1.05

3.03 ± 1.62

0.001

PLR

130.36 ± 58.51

164.20 ± 77.92

0.002

LMR

4.71 ± 4.85

3.55 ± 1.62

0.004


Conclusion

Rectal cancer patients with lower pretreatment N, NLR, PLR, and higher L and LMR are more likely to have complete response following NACRT. These markers may be used to predict treatment response in rectal cancer patients treated with NACRT.