Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Saturday
May 13
16:45 - 17:45
Stolz 2
Audits and multi-centre studies
Irena Koniarova, Czech Republic;
Lee Harrison-Carey, United Kingdom
1622
Mini-Oral
Physics
AI-based radiotherapy treatment planning quality assurance: A multi-institutional study
Petros Kalendralis, The Netherlands
MO-0308

Abstract

AI-based radiotherapy treatment planning quality assurance: A multi-institutional study
Authors:

Petros Kalendralis1, Samuel M.H. Luk2, Richard Canters3, Denis Eyssen3, Ana Vaniqui3, Cecile Wolfs3, Lars Murrer1, Wouter van Elmpt1, Alan M. Kalet4, Andre Dekker1, Johan van Soest5, Rianne Fijten6, Catharina M.L. Zegers1, Inigo Bermejo3

1Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht, The Netherlands; 2The University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States, Radiotherapy department, Vermont, USA; 3Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht , The Netherlands; 4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, United States, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington, USA; 5Brightlands Institute for Smart digital Society (BISS), Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, Heerlen, The Netherlands, Brightlands Institute for Smart digital Society (BISS), Heerlen, The Netherlands; 6Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro) , Maastricht , The Netherlands

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications have potential to assist physicists and technicians in routine clinical tasks such as quality assurance (QA) of radiotherapy treatment planning. For instance, the Bayesian network (BN) alert system developed by Luk et al.(1) has shown to be a promising tool for the detection of potential treatment planning errors. The goals of this study were to 1) assess the effectiveness of an evolved version of the BN with new variables and links in an international multi-centric setting, and 2) establish an interoperable framework that works across different technologies, clinical guidelines, and patient characteristics.

Material and Methods

Treatment planning, diagnostic and dose prescription data from three different radiotherapy centres were collected: Maastro (Netherlands) using ARIA, University of Washington (UW) and University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC) using Mosaiq as “record and verify systems”. Data from the three centres were harmonised and discretised, in order to predict radiotherapy errors, related to dose prescription, treatment plan parameters and setup equipment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with radiotherapy experts to identify relevant variables and additional links to construct the BN topology. We simulated errors based on the failure modes reported in TG 275 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine(2) and the reported errors in the three centres. The BN’s ability to identify errors at each centre was tested, after training it on data from another centre (cross-site validation).

Results

The structure of the BN network is presented in figure 1. The highest performance was observed for the BN when it was trained at the UW centre and validated at the UVMMC with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.80. The different AUC values of each validation setting are summarised in table 1. High performance was observed for the gantry angle  errors (AUC=0.84) while on the contrary, the BN did not perform adequately in the detection of the number of fractions errors when trained at UVMMC and validated at MAASTRO (AUC=0.61).

Figure 1: Structure of thE BN 


Conclusion

We successfully investigated the efficacy of the BN in an international multi-centric setting. The BN has shown the efficacy to detect possible radiotherapy planning errors only from the same institution that was trained on. This result shows that the model is generalizable across different practices with data harmonization. However, the performance on specific components, such as prescription, could be affected due to the significant differences in treatment protocols across institutes. Future work is required in terms of the error simulation method and the data standardisation methodology for the performance improvement of the BN with the involvement of additional institutions.

References

1.    PMID:30927253

2.    PMID:31967655