Patient positioning in the year 2026: Updates in positioning and immobilisation
,
Australia;
,
The Netherlands
Brief background literature instigating the use of rectal preparation, rectal preparation methods, their effectiveness, and patient experience
The patient group we stopped rectal preparation for, supporting patient information, documentation, and training
Application of and results from a clinical audit of rectal volume and prostate motion without rectal preparation
Development of and results from a patient’s experience preparing for prostate cancer radiotherapy survey.
Discussion on stopping rectal preparation, personalising preparation, and clinical impact
Background-Historical standards for immobilisation of head and neck cancer with a brief explainer of PTV expansions (Van Herk) and toxicities associated with head and neck RT
Summary of Head and Neck Immobilisation-Literature Review Table
Discussion of the OPEN Trial-this study was discussed at ESTRO plenary last year, however we now have full results which I can discuss.
A discussion point from the OPEN Trial results-the potential for personalised margins through recognising patients who move less than the anticipated population based PTV expansion
Discuss the feasibility study currently being run in SLRON exploring personalised margins
A discussion of qualitative research I conducted with Head and Neck cancer patients on the open trial, highlighting the patient voice-need for shared decision making and how immobilisation and margins may be a time point where patients can be involved in treatment related decisions.
Importance of respiratory motion reduction and overview of existing motion management techniques
The Mechanically Assisted Non-Invasive Ventilation (MANIV) technique: Principles and implementations
Clinical indications and contraindications
IGRT image comparison: with and without MANIV
Staff training and workflow adaptation
Staff feedback and experience
Patient experience and feedback
Future developments and perspectives
Symposium
RTT