Vienna, Austria

ESTRO 2023

Session Item

Optimisation, algorithms and applications for photon and electron treatment planning
7009
Poster (Digital)
Physics
Chest wall pain in lung SBRT patients: dose-volume correlations
Daniel Lambisto Castro, Spain
PO-2050

Abstract

Chest wall pain in lung SBRT patients: dose-volume correlations
Authors:

Carles Muñoz-Montplet1, Rafael Fuentes-Raspall2, Diego Jurado-Bruggeman1, Beatriz Gómez-Horsfield3, Oriol Font-Planas4, Daniel Lambisto-Castro1, Sebastià Agramunt-Chaler1, Albert Onsès-Segarra1, Ingrid Romera-Martínez1, Eduard Massana-Melchor1, Arantxa Eraso-Urién2

1Institut Català d'Oncologia, Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Girona, Spain; 2Institut Català d'Oncologia, Radiation Oncology, Girona, Spain; 3Institut Català d'Oncologia, Haematology, Girona, Spain; 4Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Physics, Bellaterra, Spain

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

The risk for chest wall pain (CWP) in lung SBRT is positively related to several ribs’ dose-volume parameters: D0.5cc, D1cc, D2cc, D5cc and V30 (Ma et al, 2019). This study aimed to determine the relationship between any DVH parameter of the ribs and CWP incidence in a single-institution lung SBRT series.

Material and Methods

We reviewed medical records to identify CWP in a series of 54 lung patients treated with a prescription dose of 60 Gy in 5 or 8 fractions, using SBRT at our institution between 2012 and 2017. We calculated the ribs’ mean Vx and Dx DVHs and performed heteroscedastic t-tests at each point (bin s of 0.06 Gy and 0.05 % respectively) to evaluate the significance (p<0.01) of the differences between patients with and without CWP. We performed all calculations with the Acuros XB algorithm implemented in the Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems; Palo Alto, CA, USA), reporting dose-to-medium.

Results

We observed CWP in 15 patients. Fig.1 shows that patients with CWP had slightly lower Vx values in the low-dose region, while this trend reversed in the intermediate and high-dose regions. Fig. 2 shows that patients with CWP had higher Dx values, especially for high dose volumes. Near-maximum rib doses showed the highest correlation, as expected. Although our findings are in accordance with the literature, none of these differences was statistically significant, probably due to a lack of statistical power.

Conclusion

We observed CWP in 28% of our lung SBRT series. We did not find any statistical difference in ribs’ Vx and Dx parameters between the non-CWP and the CWP groups. Near-maximum ribs doses showed the highest correlation with CWP appearance. Larger datasets might help predict radiation-induced CWP better.