Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
09:00 - 10:00
Poster Station 2
10: Urology 1
Luca Incrocci, The Netherlands
2190
Poster Discussion
Clinical
Derivation and external validation of a RAPID Risk score for predicting significant prostate cancer
Max Peters, The Netherlands
PD-0416

Abstract

Derivation and external validation of a RAPID Risk score for predicting significant prostate cancer
Authors:

Max Peters1, David Eldred-Evans2, Martin J. Connor3, Mariana Bertoncelli Tanaka3, Heather Bhola-Stewart3, Taimur T Shah3, Shahzad Ahmad4, Mohamed Noureldin2, Kathie Wong4, Henry Tam3, David Hrouda3, Mathias Winkler2, Peter van Rossum5, Piet Kurver5, Stephen Gordon4, Hasan Qazi6, Hashim U. Ahmed2, Ugo Giovanni Falagario7, Ivan Jambor8, Alberto Briganti9, Tobias Nordström10, Giuseppe Carrieri7, Laura Powell11, Suchita Joshi12, Elizabeth Pegers12

1University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2Imperial College London, Urology, London, United Kingdom; 3Imperial College London, Urology , London, United Kingdom; 4Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Urology, London, United Kingdom; 5University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy , Utrecht, The Netherlands; 6St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust, Urology, London, United Kingdom; 7University of Foggia, Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation , Foggia, Italy; 8University of Turku, Radiology, Turku, Finland; 9IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Urological Research Institute, Milan, Italy; 10Karolinska Institute, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden; 11St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Urology, London, United Kingdom; 12RM Partners: West London Cancer Alliance, Urology Pathway Group, London, United Kingdom

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Although multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) has high sensitivity for significant prostate cancer (sPCa), the lower specificity, particularly with equivocal (PIRADS 3) lesions, can result in numerous unnecessary biopsies. We aimed to develop and externally validate a simple scoring system to predict which men with a visible MRI lesion might consider avoiding an immediate prostate biopsy.

Material and Methods

We analyzed data from 1,189 men with a visible MRI lesion from a prospective multi-institutional registry. A total of 14 clinical and radiological MRI variables known to be associated with risk of sPCa were evaluated. Using multivariable logistic regression, we derived a parsimonious risk score for different definitions of sPCa. The performance of the risk score was internally validated and then externally validated in 1825 men across 6 international cohorts. For the final risk scores nomograms were created and analyses of clinical benefit were performed.

Results

For the primary endpoint (detection of ≥Gleason 3+4), the simplified RAPID risk score included age, PSA density (logged), prior negative biopsy, prostate volume and MRI Score (PIRADS or LIKERT score) (figure 1, available at: https://rapidriskscore.shinyapps.io/RapidRiskScore1/). The model had a discriminative ability (c-statistic or AUC) of 0.82 after internal validation which was similar in different years of data collection and in the external validation cohorts. This simplified model was compared to alternative models with additional clinical variables (including Afro-Caribbean ethnicity, abnormal DRE and a positive family history) and the clinical differences were negligible With thresholds for ≥Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer from 1-20% predicted by the model, the model was able to reduce the amount of biopsies up to 10.7%, while missing up to 1.9% of cancers. The full models reduced biopsies up to 11.6%, albeit missing up to 2.4% of cancers (figure 2).


Conclusion

The basic RAPID risk score is a simple five-item score which provides a standardized tool for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with a visible MRI lesion. It is available online as an app and  its performance has been externally validated across multiple external, geographically distinct and independent datasets. In the context of a risk-stratified MRI pathway, this tool can support patients and clinicians making decisions regarding the need for prostate biopsy.