Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
16:55 - 17:55
Room D2
New technologies in clinical practice
Daniela Schmitt, Germany;
Jeroen Van de Kamer, The Netherlands
2540
Proffered Papers
Physics
17:45 - 17:55
Universal and dynamic ridge filter for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy
Vivek Maradia, Switzerland
OC-0622

Abstract

Universal and dynamic ridge filter for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy
Authors:

Vivek Maradia1,2, Isabella Colizzi1,2, Anne Savenije1,3, David Meer1, Jacobus Maarten Schippers4, Damien Charles Weber1,5,6, Antony John Lomax1,2, Oxana Actis1, Serena Psoroulas1

1Paul Scherrer Institute, Center for Proton Therapy, Villigen, Switzerland; 2ETH Zurich, Department of Physics, Zurich, Switzerland; 3TU Delft, Department of Physics, Delft, The Netherlands; 4Paul Scherrer Institute, Larger Accelerator facility , Villigen, Switzerland; 5University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 6University of Bern, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Our objective is to design a universal dynamic energy modulator (ridge filter) for PBS proton therapy. By using a ridge filter, the Bragg peak is broadened, thus lowering the number of energies required for homogeneous target coverage. Treatment delivery time in PBS proton therapy depends on beam-on time and the dead time (time required to change energy layers and/or lateral position). By lowering the number of required energies, we want to reduce the treatment delivery time.

Material and Methods

To reduce the number of energy layers, we developed a new energy modulation unit that comprises two identical ridge filters placed just before the isocenter (shown in Figure 1). Both ridge filters are movable relative to each other to change the Bragg peak’s characteristics dynamically. For predicting the Bragg peak shape with the ridge filter, we used Monte Carlo simulations implemented in TOPAS with the beam model of PSI Gantry 2. To compare the reduction in energy layers with ridge filter, we generated eight different spread out Bragg peaks (SOBPs) with a thickness range from 4 to 11 cm with and without the ridge filter.

Results

Figure 1 shows that a maximum broadening of the Bragg peak is achieved (almost 2 cm SOBP) if the filter is aligned, peaks with peaks (figure 1(a)). However, if the filter is aligned peak with valley (figure 1(b)), the ridge filter acts as a range shifter. Figures 1(c) show an 11 cm wide SOBP generated by the ridge filter while aligning peak with valley for the first two high-energy beams (to get the sharper fall-off) and for the remaining lower energies, the filter is aligned in peak-to-peak position (to maximize the Bragg peak broadening). In this way, the dynamic ridge filter produces a sharper distal fall-off compared to a normal ridge filter. Table 1 shows the number of energy layers required to generate different widths of SOBP with and without ridge filter. With the dynamic ridge filter, we managed to reduce the required energy layers by a factor of three compared to a SOBP generated without a ridge filter. 


 


Conclusion

In this study, we showed that by using a newly developed dynamic ridge filter we could reduce the number of energy layers required to generate different SOBP by a factor of three while being independent of energy. As we can use the same ridge filter design for different types of tumors, the use of a dynamic ridge filter will not increase the complexity of treatment planning. As this design is not patient-specific or beam model-specific, it is easily adaptable for other proton therapy facilities, too.