Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
16:55 - 17:55
Room D2
New technologies in clinical practice
Daniela Schmitt, Germany;
Jeroen Van de Kamer, The Netherlands
2540
Proffered Papers
Physics
17:35 - 17:45
Comparison of hypoxia adapting relative biological effectiveness models for proton therapy
Guillermo Garrido Hernandez, Norway
OC-0621

Abstract

Comparison of hypoxia adapting relative biological effectiveness models for proton therapy
Authors:

Guillermo Garrido Hernandez1, Helge Henjum2, Marte Høiskar1, Tordis Dahle3, Kathrine Redalen1, Kristian Ytre-Hauge2

1Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Physics, Trondheim, Norway; 2University of Bergen, Department of Physics and Technology, Bergen, Norway; 3Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Bergen, Norway

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

In proton therapy, the biological dose (Dbio) is calculated by means of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). RBE has been proposed to vary with the linear energy transfer (LET), physical dose and other factors including the oxygen level in the tumor. Models to calculate Dbio considering the effect of hypoxic cells typically estimate the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) using the partial oxygen pressure (pO2) and a parameter for the radiation quality such as the LET or the specific energy. Our aim was to implement and compare different OER models as input to RBE calculation and to use a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation tool to explore the impact of hypoxia on Dbio. Hypoxia PET imaging was used to estimate the pO2 in patients in order to investigate the effects of hypoxia adaptation on proton plans.

Material and Methods

We implemented a calculation for hypoxia-adapted Dbio, i.e., the RBE-OER-weighted dose (ROWD), based on four different approaches to estimate the OER (Wenzl and Wilkens 2011, Dahle et al. 2020, Tinganelli et al. 2015, Mein et al. 2021). The OER-calculations were combined with either a phenomenological RBE model for protons, or the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM). First, the FLUKA MC tool was used to simulate a proton beam irradiating a virtual water phantom with different pO2 levels. Secondly, a proton plan was made in Eclipse TPS (Varian) for a head and neck cancer case calculating the pO2 from [18F]-EF5 PET as input to the OER estimation. For both the phantom and the patient simulations, the physical dose (D), the hypoxia-adapted linear-quadratic parameters (αh, βh), the dose-averaged LET (LETd), and the OER were estimated.

Results

Water phantom simulations using MC showed good agreement with theoretical OER models. OER estimates corresponded to clinically relevant pO2 values and were similar between models except for the model from Tinganelli et al. 2015, which estimates approximately a 10% higher OER (Figure 1). At the same time, the models from Wenzl and Willkens 2011 and Dahle et al. 2020 are more susceptible to LET variations than the models from Mein et al. 2021 and Tinganelli et al. 2015 that particularly shows no change for the LET variations on proton LET scales.  The corresponding depth-dose curves resulted in a ROWD for all implemented models that followed the same trend with a reduction of the ROWD in the hypoxic regions (Figure 2). Preliminary results from the patient case indicates an OER range of 1 to 1.6 in the planning target volume.



Conclusion

We implemented a calculation of Dbio in FLUKA MC using different OER estimations and variable RBE calculations in order to perform hypoxia adaptation of proton therapy plans. Application and comparison of the models showed overall good agreement between different models, although some variation in LET sensitivity was observed. With  reliable hypoxia information, applications of OER adapted/adapting RBE models could become a useful tool for treatment plan evaluation and optimization.