Copenhagen, Denmark
Onsite/Online

ESTRO 2022

Session Item

Sunday
May 08
16:55 - 17:55
Room D2
New technologies in clinical practice
Daniela Schmitt, Germany;
Jeroen Van de Kamer, The Netherlands
2540
Proffered Papers
Physics
16:55 - 17:05
Camera-based in-vivo dosimetry using dual-material 3D printed scintillator arrays
Nicholas Lynch, Canada
OC-0617

Abstract

Camera-based in-vivo dosimetry using dual-material 3D printed scintillator arrays
Authors:

Nicholas Lynch1, Thalat Monajemi2, James Robar2

1Dalhousie University, Physics & Atmospheric Science, Halifax, Canada; 2Dalhousie University, Radiation Oncology, Halifax, Canada

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

To describe a methodology for the dual-material fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing of plastic scintillator arrays, to characterize their light output under irradiation using an sCMOS camera, and to establish a methodology for their dosimetric calibration.

Material and Methods

We have published an investigation into the fabrication and characterization of single element FDM printed scintillators with the goal of producing customizable dosimeters for radiation therapy applications. This work builds on previous investigations by extending the concept to the production of high resolution (scintillating element size 3 mm³) planar and curved scintillator arrays (Fig. 1A/1B). The arrays were fabricated using a BCN3D Epsilon W27 3D printer and are composed of polylactic acid (PLA) filament and BCF-10 plastic scintillator (Saint Gobain Crystals, Ohio, USA).

The light signals emitted from both arrays under irradiation were imaged using 10 ms exposures from a 16-bit PCO Panda 4.2 sCMOS camera (PCO Photonics Ltd., Ontario, Canada) positioned at the foot of the treatment couch (210 cm from array). 6 MV photon fields (Truebeam, Varian, Palo Alto, USA) were delivered using gantry and collimator angles of 0°, 100 Monitor Units, field size of 20 x 20 cm², dose rate of 600 MU/min and source-to-surface distance of 100 cm. Each array was placed vertically on 10 cm slab of solid water with the beam incident on the top of each array (Fig. 1C/1D).

The collected images were processed using a purpose-built MATLAB program to correct for known optical aretfacts and determine the light output for each scintillating element (Fig. 2A). Element-to-element sensitivity was investigated by exposing individual elements to an identical known dose under uniform scatter conditions. Following correction for sensitivity, the light output for the planar array was compared to Radiochromic film and Monte Carlo simulations based on geometric and material information obtained from the arrays 3D print model.


Results

The results establish the feasibility of dual-material 3D printing for the fabrication of patient-specific plastic scintillator arrays and demonstrate that they provide sufficient signal in response to therapeutic doses. However, the 3D printed scintillating elements were found to possess a non-uniform sensitivity with an average element to element sensitivity difference of 2.6%. Following sensitivity correction, planar array measurements compared favorably with Monte Carlo simulations (Fig. 2B).

Conclusion

In this study we developed and characterized 3D printed arrays of plastic scintillators and demonstrated a methodology for dosimetric calibration of simple geometries. Monte Carlo simulations suggest the possibility of array sensitivity corrections without need for pre-treatment irradiation.