Session Item

Monday
May 09
10:30 - 11:30
Auditorium 15
Growing your network
Anne Gasnier, France;
Jenny Bertholet, Switzerland;
Laura Mullaney, Ireland;
Sophie Perryck, Switzerland
Speed dating
Young
09:23 - 09:32
Neural network based synthetic CTs for adaptive proton therapy of lung cancer
Adrian Thummerer, Germany
OC-0478

Abstract

Neural network based synthetic CTs for adaptive proton therapy of lung cancer
Authors:

Adrian Thummerer1, Paolo Zaffino2, Carmen Seller Oria1, Arturs Meijers1, Gabriel Guterres Marmitt1, Joao Seco3,4, Johannes Langendijk1, Antje Knopf1, Antje Knopf5, Maria Francesca Spadea2, Stefan Both1

1University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, Groningen, The Netherlands; 2Magna Graecia University Catanzaro, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Catanzaro, Italy; 3Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; 4Heidelberg University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg, Germany; 5University Hospital of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Adaptive proton therapy (APT) accounts for anatomical and physiological changes to ensure target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing during the entire treatment course. An imaging modality that may detect these anatomical changes is cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, CBCT-images suffer from severe image artifacts (e.g. scatter) that hinder accurate proton dose calculations. Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) have shown potential to correct CBCTs and create synthetic CTs (sCTs) that enable proton dose calculations in various anatomical locations (e.g head&neck, pelvis). In this study such a DCNN together with an accompanying planning CT (pCT) based patient specific correction technique was used to generate sCTs and their suitability for adaptive proton therapy of lung cancer patients was evaluated in terms of image quality and dosimetric accuracy.

Material and Methods

A dataset consisting of CBCT- and same-day repeat CT-images from 33 lung cancer patients, treated with proton therapy, was used to train and evaluate the DCNN. 3-fold cross validation was employed to utilize all 33 patients for image and dosimetric evaluation. After the DCNN-conversion, an automatic patient specific correction method, using a smoothed and truncated difference map between the pCT and sCT, was introduced, mainly to correct CT-numbers of lung tissue, which are difficult to generate consistently and accurately by the DCNN.

For image quality assessment, mean absolute error (MAE) and mean error (ME) were calculated for sCTs with (sCTcor) and without (sCTorig) the pCT-based correction method. For the dosimetric evaluation, clinical treatment plans were recalculated on both synthetic CTs and gamma pass ratios (3%/3mm) were used to compare dose distributions to those calculated on the reference CT scans. 

Results

Figure 1 shows an overview of CBCT, CT, sCTorig and sCTcor for patient 5 together with difference images between sCTs and CT. Average MAEs (ME) of 34.7±7.2 HU (5.2±9.8 HU) and 30.8±4.7 (2.7±4.8 HU) were observed for sCTorig and sCTcor respectively. The recalculation of clinical treatment plans resulted in average gamma pass ratios of 93.9±4.6 % for sCTorig and 96.9±2.2 % for sCTcor. Results from the gamma analysis are presented in Figure 2 for each patient individually.




Conclusion

The image quality evaluation and the dosimetric accuracy assessment indicates that neural network based sCTs combined with a patient specific correction method may be utilized for adaptive proton therapy in lung cancer patients.