Session Item

Tuesday
May 10
08:30 - 09:10
Auditorium 15
Toxicity vs tumour control: What makes a good pelvic radiotherapy plan?
Peter Hoskin, United Kingdom
Teaching lecture
Interdisciplinary
16:50 - 17:00
Applying column generation to the intensity-modulated high-dose-rate brachytherapy inverse planning
OC-0042

Abstract

Applying column generation to the intensity-modulated high-dose-rate brachytherapy inverse planning
Authors:

Majd Antaki1, Marc-André Renaud2, Jan Seuntjens1, Shirin A. Enger1

1McGill University, Department of Oncology, Montreal, Canada; 2Polytechnique Montréal, Department of Mathematical & Industrial Engineering, Montreal, Canada

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Intensity modulated high dose rate brachytherapy (IMBT) is a rapidly developing application of brachytherapy where anisotropic dose distributions can be produced at each source dwell position. This technique is made possible by placing rotating metallic shields inside brachytherapy needles or catheters. By dynamically directing the radiation towards the tumours and away from the healthy tissues a more conformal dose distribution is created at the expense of increasing complexity of the treatment planning process. In this study column generation method is investigated for IMBT treatment plan optimization.

Material and Methods

A column generation optimization algorithm is developed to optimize the dwell times and shield angles. At every iteration, the plan is optimized with the chosen dwell position and shield angle (DPSA) combinations and the DPSA that would best improve the cost function at every iteration is added to the plan. The optimization process can be stopped when the clinical plan evaluation criteria have been met to limit the plan complexity. In this work the optimization was stopped when no more DPSAs is expected to add value to the current plan.


Results

The column generation approach yielded a near-optimal treatment plan with 387 DPSAs from 2080 possible DPSAs for a prostate case. The final iteration contained a plan with a complexity five times smaller than the original one. Figure 1 shows that the cost function converges to the asymptotic cost, which is the cost when all DPSAs are included in the optimization. Figure 2 illustrates the dosimetric indices of interest at each iteration. After some fluctuations D1cc and D2cc of the organs at risk (OAR) reach their maxima during the first 50 iterations, then decrease to stabilize after 100 iterations. With the D2cc of both the bladder and the rectum being below 10 Gy, and the D1cc of the urethra below 15 Gy, the dosimetric requirement for the OAR are satisfied while still having V100 > 15 Gy in the planning target volume.

Conclusion

The column generation method produced a high-quality deliverable prostate IMBT plan. The treatment plan quality eventually reached a plateau where adding more DPSAs had a minimal effect on dose volume histogram parameters. The iterative nature of the column generation method allows early termination of the treatment plan creation process as soon as dose volume histogram parameters satisfy their clinical requirements or if they have stabilized.