Session Item

Sunday
May 08
08:00 - 08:40
Room D2
Robust treatment planning in particle therapy: Clinical implementation and potential pitfalls
Christian Richter, Germany
2050
Teaching lecture
Physics
12:05 - 12:20
Tumor regression of cervical cancer during chemoradiation evaluated by the T-score in EMBRACE I
OC-0025

Abstract

Tumor regression of cervical cancer during chemoradiation evaluated by the T-score in EMBRACE I
Authors:

Jacob Christian Lindegaard1, Primoz Petric2, Maximilian P. Schmid3, Christine Haie-Meder4, Lars U. Fokdal1, Alina Sturdza3, Peter Hoskin5, Umesh Mahantshetty6, Barbara Segedin7, Kjersti Bruheim8, Fleur Huang9, Bhavana Rai10, Rachel Cooper11, Elzbieta van der Steen-Banasik12, Erik Van Limbergen13, Bradley R. Pieters14, Li Tee Tan15, Remi Nout16, Astrid de Leeuw17, Nicole Nesvacil3, Kathrin Kirchheiner3, Ina Jürgenliemk-Schultz17, Kari Tanderup1, Christian Kirisits3, Richard Pötter3, EMBRACE Collaborative Group3

1Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Zürich University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Zürich, Switzerland; 3Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria; 4Institut Gustave Roussy, Brachytherapy Unit, Department of Radiotherapy, Villejuif, France; 5Mount Vernon Hospital, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom; 6Tata Memorial Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mumbai, India; 7Institute of Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 8Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 9Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Department of Oncology, Edmonton, Canada; 10Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Chandigarh, India; 11St. James University Hospital, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom; 12Radiotherapiegroep Arnhem, Department of Radiotherapy, Arnhem, The Netherlands; 13UZ Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium; 14Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 15Addenbrook's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Department of Oncology, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 16Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands; 17University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

A simple scoring system (T-score) for integrating diagnostic information from clinical examination and MRI has recently been shown to be a strong prognostic tool for local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with chemoradiation and MRI guided brachytherapy (BT) in a single centre cohort1. The aim of the present work was to investigate the performance of the T-score in the prospective multicentre EMBRACE I study and to use the T-score for evaluating the prognostic implications of regression obtained during initial chemoradiation.

Material and Methods

The EMBRACE I study recruited 1416 patients of which 1318 were available for analysis of both local control and survival. All patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy followed by MRI guided adaptive BT. Concomitant chemotherapy was given to 95%. A ranked ordinal scale of 0-3 points (Table 1) was used to assess the primary tumour regarding local involvement of 8 anatomic locations typical for spread of cervical cancer: cervix, left parametrium, right parametrium, corpus uteri, vagina, bladder, ureter, rectum. The 8 locations and the ranking were aligned with already established definitions used in e.g. staging systems. A 1-point increase per step was used. The T-score was calculated twice for each patient by adding the points obtained from each of the 8 locations (possible range of 0-23) at diagnosis and at BT, respectively.


Results

The median T-score at diagnosis was 5 with a mean value of 5.6. The cumulative frequency distribution of the T-score showed a left shift when re-scored at BT (Figure 1A) with a significant decrease of the mean to 4.2 (p0.001). Overall survival of 697 patients with a low initial T-score (5) or 351 patients with an initial high (>5) but low T-score at BT (5) was similar (Fig. 1B). In contrast, survival in the 270 patients with a T-score remaining high at BT (>5) was significantly reduced (p0.001). A similar pattern (Fig. 1C) was observed for local control (p=0.001). By dividing the patients into four groups according to T-score (0-3/4-5/6-8/>8) a significant and gradual decrease in survival with increasing T-score (p0.001) could be demonstrated both at diagnosis (not shown) and at BT (Fig. 1D), but with a better discrimination and a larger difference between the T-score groups using the latter. Cox regression showed that the T-score was a significant predictor of both OS and LC when analysed in the context of traditional prognostic parameters for LACC.


Conclusion

The T-score concept is applicable to the Embrace I study cohort and provides substantial information concerning impact of initial regression during chemoradiation on the probability for obtaining local control and survival. The T-score is a potential selection tool for treatment modifications.

1Lindegaard et al, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Mar 15;106(4):754-763.