Pre-treatment verification of SBRT using novel OCTAVIUS detector 1600SRS and portal dosimetry.
PO-1615
Abstract
Pre-treatment verification of SBRT using novel OCTAVIUS detector 1600SRS and portal dosimetry.
Authors: Barbara Bajon1, Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska1, Piotr Romański1
1Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Medical Physics, Poznań, Poland
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
The purpose of the study was
to implement the new 2D-array 1600SRS with OCTAVIUS rotational phantom for pre-treatment
verification and comparison 112 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans
for 56 stereotactic patients. All plans used the flattening filter-free (FFF)
photon beam.
Material and Methods
The OCTAVIUS detector
1600SRS is a 2D-array with 1521 liquid-filled ionization chambers with an
active volume of 2.5 x 2.5 x 0.5mm3 (0.003cm3). The main
applications of the OCTAVIUS detector 1600SRS are pre-treatment plan
verification in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of small fields up to 15 x 15cm2. Detector
layout in the center area is 6.5cm x 6.5cm with a spacing of 2.5mm. Initially, the
new 2D-array 1600SRS was tested. The linearity, dose rate, angle dependence were
checked, and cross-calibration for different field sizes was done.
The study
investigates verification of 56 VMAT SBRT plans (6FFF) located in lung, bone,or
metastatic node. GTV volume ranged from 0.2 to 38.0 cm3. The fraction
dose was 8 to 11.5Gy.
The two measurement
methods: the 2D perpendicular field by field (PFF) for planar dose distribution
with Varian's Portal Dosimetry (PD) and the 3D dose distribution reconstructed
from the field by field measurements (RFF) OCTAVIUS detector 1600SRS combine
with Octavius Rotation Unit 4D were implemented.
Gamma analysis
with 5% of maximum dose threshold, local normalization with Dose Difference
(DD) 2%, and Distance-to-Agreement (DTA) 2mm were done with passing rates more
than 95%. The 2D gamma analysis for the Portal Dosimetry with ARIA 15.6 (Varian
Med. Systems, USA) and 3D analysis for the 1600SRS detector with VeriSoft
8.0.1.0 (PTW, Freiburg) were obtained.
Results
The agreement of the tested parameters with the
producer's specifications was demonstrated. For different sizes of fields, the
cross-calibration factor was designated. Average value of cross factor for
field 3x3cm2 was 0.949, for field 4x4cm2 was 0.956 and
for field 5x5cm2 was 0.962. For PD verification plans, there were 10.7%
incorrect plans of all. Average volumetric 3D gamma evaluation (L2%/2mm, Th
5%) results was 98.6% (±1.05%) for the Octavius plans and 98.7% (±0.89%) for PD
plans. The minimum passing gamma rate for PD verification plans was 92.7%,
while this value for OCTAVIUS detector was 95.4%. The percentage difference
between the individual fields analyzed based on the two methods ranged from ±3%.
The greatest difference was obtained for the field that did not meet the gamma
results, and it was 5.3%.
Conclusion
Both dosimetry methods showed comparable results and
can be used as an alternative to each other for verification stereotactic
plans. The OCTAVIUS detector 1600SRS is more precise, characterized by high
resolution and the possibility of absolute measurement. The PD method is faster
than the array, but it’s less accurate. If the result of the gamma analysis is
lower than 95%, additional verification should be made by using OCTAVIUS
detector 1600SRS.