Robotic Stereotactic Radiosurgery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer-Local control and tolerance
PO-1222
Abstract
Robotic Stereotactic Radiosurgery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer-Local control and tolerance
Authors: Catarina Silva1, Marina Amorim1, Maria Adelina Costa2,1, Carlos Fardilha2,1, João Gagean2,1, Joana Vale2, Ricardo Guedes2, Paula Genésio2, Pedro Vieira2, Paulo Costa2,1
1Hospital de Braga, Radiation Oncology, Braga, Portugal; 2CUF Institute, Radiation Oncology - Júlio Teixeira S.A., Porto, Portugal
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Despite
of new therapeutic approaches, including both systemic and local therapy, locally
advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has a poor prognosis. Standard doses of
conventionally fractionated radiation have had minimal to no impact on the
survival duration of patients with LAPC. However, stereotactic body
radiotherapy (SBRT) using CyberKnife (CK), a highly conformal high-dose radiation
per fraction, allows the precise delivery of a large ablative radiation dose to
a tumour volume while sparing surrounding organs and tissues. This study was
designed to evaluate the short-term efficacy and toxicity of image-guided
robotic stereotactic radiosurgery- CK for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Material and Methods
We analysed
9 patients with LAPC, ranging in age from
40 to 86 years (mean: 65), treated with robotic stereotactic radiosurgery-CK,
from February 2017 to December 2020. All patients had previous systemic
therapy, with no or minimal response. The median total prescription dose was 36
Gy (range 33-40 Gy) delivered in 3 to 6 fractions. The median BED was 111 Gy (range
87-144 Gy). The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as gross tumour volume
(GTV) plus 2-3 mm, and at least 95% PTV should be covered by 80% isodose
surface. The median volume of PTV was 63 cm³ (22-120 cm³).
Results
Of
the 9 patients, 5 were male and 4 female. In 5 cases, the tumour was located at
the pancreatic head and 4 at the pancreatic body. The median follow-up was 10
months (range 3-31 months). All patients completed the treatment prescribed,
with a good tolerance. Two patients
presented grade I nausea, and there was a case of grade II vomiting. There were
no grade III/IV toxicity. The evaluation was performed with a CT scan and/or
PET-CT scan. Local control was achieved in 7 patients, 4 with complete response
and 3 with partial response. Two patients presented disease progression, mainly
with hepatic metastases. The median OS was 10 months (range 3-31). By the time
of the present analysis, and with a mean follow-up of 10 months, 4 patients
remain with no evidence of disease.
Conclusion
The conformity and
rapid dose fall-off associated with SBRT offer the potential for dose
escalation. Image-guided robotic stereotactic radiosurgery with CK may be
considered a treatment option to achieve local control of locally advanced
pancreatic cancer, with limited toxicity to normal surrounding tissues. The use
of a multi-fraction regimen and high total dose as allowable based on
dose-volume constraints to organs at risk should be considered to minimize
toxicity and improve local control outcomes. In the present study 44,4% of the
patients remains with no evidence of disease, with a mean follow-up period of
10 months.
Better understanding
of biological mechanisms for tumour response underlying stereotactic
radiosurgery treatment for LAPC, will allow for additional improvements in
disease control.
However, long-term
follow-up is necessary to evaluate the survival and late toxicity.