Session Item

Saturday
March 05
10:45 - 11:45
Gold Hall
Laryngeal/Hypopharygeal Cancer
Mererid Evans, United Kingdom
Interactive tumour board
Outcomes and toxicities of curative reirradiation for head and neck carcinomas
Arnaud Beddok, France
PO-0992

Abstract

Outcomes and toxicities of curative reirradiation for head and neck carcinomas
Authors:

Arnaud BEDDOK1, Caroline Saint-Martin2, Catherine Ala Eddine3, Laurence Champion4, Samar Krhili5, Anne Chilles6, Ludivine Catteau1, Farid Goudjil1, Sofia Sefkili1, Malika Amessis1, Dominique Peurien1, Olivier Choussy7, Christophe Le Tourneau8, Rémi Dendale9, Irène Buvat10, Gilles Créhange1, Valentin Calugaru1

1Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology, Paris, France; 2Institut Curie, Satistics, Paris, France; 3Institut Curie, Radiology, Paris, France; 4Institut Curie, Nuclear Medicine, Saint-Cloud, France; 5Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology, Paris , France; 6Insitut Curie, Radiation Oncology, Paris, France; 7Institut Curie, Head and Neck surgery, Paris, France; 8Institut Curie, Medical Oncology, Paris, France; 9Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology, Orsay, France; 10Institut Curie, LITO, Orsay, France

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Despite the constant improvement of techniques, locoregional recurrences (LR) after radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) remain frequent. In a curative context, in case of inoperability or incomplete resection, reirradiation (reRT) can be discussed. The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcomes and toxicities of patients treated with curative reRT (either by intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT], or by proton therapy [PT]) for recurrent HNC.

Material and Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent curative-intent reRT for nonresectable recurrent or second primary HNC from 30/08/2012 to 08/04/2019. All patients included received curative reRT for HNC LR. CTCAEv5 was used to assess acute and late toxicities. Follow-up was considered as the time between the end of reRT and the date of last follow-up. Survival times were defined between date of the end of reRT and the event date. Patient free of event have been censored to their last known contact date.

Results

Twenty-three patients were re-irradiated (47.8% with IMRT and 52.2% with PT) with curative intent for advanced HNC. The patients were mostly men (73.9%) and WHO 0 (87%). Locations at the time of reRT were mainly the nasopharynx, cervical nodes, oropharynx, nasal fossae and maxillary sinus. Nine patients underwent surgery prior to reRT, seven had neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and six had concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The median interval time between the two irradiations was: 23.9 months (IQR: 15.3–37.2 months). The median maximum dose prescribed to the CTV was: 66 Gy EBR (55.8-70.2 Gy), median overall treatment time: 54 days (45-66 days), median CTV and PTV volumes: 49.8 cc (IQR: 32.4–88.8 cc) and 124.3 cc (IQR: 76.9– 208.6 cc), respectively. After a median follow-up of 15 months from the end of reRT, a total number of 18 patients (78.2%) developed LR. Nine LR (39%) occurred inside previously irradiated targets. The local control (LC) rate and survival without LR at 18 months were: 29.3 CI95%[15-57] and 26.1%[13.1-51.9]. Most patients (74%) did not have grade 2 toxicity before the start of reRT. Acute toxicities of grade ≥ 2 were radiomucositis (43.5%), dysgeusia (27.3%), dysphagia (26%), and radiodermatitis (13%). Main late grade ≥ 2 toxicities were: dysphagia (34.8%), trismus (30.4%), xerostomia (26.1%), dysgeusia (26.1%), cranial nerve deficit (17.4%), osteoradionecrosis (13.4%), and temporal radionecrosis (8.7%). Carotid blowout occurred in three patients (13.4%). Dysgeusia was significantly more frequent in the photon than in the proton group (p=0.017).



Conclusion

Curative reRT in HNC is possible for selected cases, but the LR rate in the irradiated field and the risk of toxicity grade ≥ 2 remain high. Improved selection criteria and definition of target volumes may improve the outcome of these patients.