Session Item

Tuesday
August 31
08:30 - 09:10
Room 2.2
Physics perspective of stereotactic cardiac ablation
Raphaël Moeckli, Switzerland
4070
Teaching lecture
Physics
12:20 - 12:30
SBRT versus TAE/TACE in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: results from a Phase III trial (NCT02323360)
OC-0373

Abstract

SBRT versus TAE/TACE in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: results from a Phase III trial (NCT02323360)
Authors: Comito|, Tiziana(1)*[tiziana.comito@humanitas.it];Loi|, Mauro(1);Franzese|, Ciro(1);Clerici|, Elena(1);Pedicini|, Vittorio(2);Poretti|, Dario(2);Solbiati|, Luigi(2);Rimassa|, Lorenza(3);Scorsetti|, Marta(1);
(1)Humanitas Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Rozzano Milan, Italy;(2)Humanitas Research Hospital, Interventional Radiology, Rozzano Milan, Italy;(3)Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Oncology, Rozzano Milan, Italy;
Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver tumor and the third cause of cancer death in the world. In unresectable  HCC patients with intermediate-stage disease, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE)  +/- co-administration of arterial chemotherapy (TACE) has shown partial responses in 15–55% of cases, and significantly delays tumor progression and vascular invasion. However while repeated courses of TAE/TACE  can be administered in case of incomplete response, alternative treatment options may be considered to maximize local control. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), delivering very high doses in a limited number of fractions in a highly conformal manner, is an emerging treatment option for radical treatment of inoperable HCC and may be proposed in case of local relapse following one or more TAE/TACE courses. 

Material and Methods

This is a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled, unblinded, parallel-group superiority trial of SBRT versus standard TAE/TACE for the curative treatment of intermediate stage of HCC after incomplete reponse following one TAE/TACE cycle (NCT02323360). Primary endpoint was Local Control (LC). Secondary endpoints were Progression Free-Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS) and incidence of acute and late complications. In order to detect an HR=0.18 (which translates in  45% difference at the analysis time) with a power of 80% at 5% 2 sided of the log-rank test , 18 events (approximately 50 patients, 25 per arm) are needed. A preliminary analysis was performed when the preplanned number of events (n=20) was reached.

Results

RESULTS:At the time of our analysis 40 patients were enrolled, 19 (49%) in the TAE/TACE and 21 (51%) in the SBRT arm respectively. Median age was 75 (range 52-86) years. All patients received at least ≥ 1 TAE/TACE course prior to enrolment; no significant differences were found between the 2 arms with regard to prior resection (n=8, 20%), Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA, n=14, 35%) or Percutaneous Ethanol Injection (PEI, n=4, 10%). Median follow-up was 18 months (range, 2-56 months). Patients were classed stage A and B according Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system in 7 (18%) and 33 (82%) respectively. One and 2-year LC rates were 57% and 36%, with a median LC of 12 months  (CI95% 16-33 months). Use of SBRT resulted in superior LC as compared to TAE/TACE (median not reached versus 8 months, p=0.0002). PFS was 29% and 16% at 1 and at 2 years, respectively. At the event of progression, 8 patients in the SBRT arm received a further TAE/TACE administration while 10 patients in the TAE/TACE arm received SBRT. OS was 96% and 90% at 1 year and at 2 years, respectively. No grade ≥3 toxicity was recorded, and no differences in overall toxicities were found between the 2 arms.

Figure 1Figure 2

Conclusion

In patients affected by unoperable HCC experiencing incomplete response following  ≥1 cycle of TAE/TACE, SBRT  was correlated to significantly higher LC rates as compared to rechallenge with TAE/TACE.