Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for oligometastatic lymph-nodal relapses in gynecological cancer
GIUSEPPINA MANDURINO,
Italy
PO-1300
Abstract
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for oligometastatic lymph-nodal relapses in gynecological cancer
Authors: Giuseppina Mandurino1, Andrei Fodor2, Stefano Lorenzo Villa1, Simone Baroni1, Ariadna Sanchez Galvan1, Roberta Tummineri3, Pietro Pacifico1, Flavia Zerbetto2, Chiara Lucrezia Deantoni2, Paola Mangili4, Antonella Del Vecchio4, Stefano Arcangeli5, Nadia Gisella Di Muzio6
1IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute / University of Milano-BIcocca, Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy; 2IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy; 3IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Radiation Oncolgy, Milan, Italy; 4IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Medical Physics, Milan, Italy; 5University of Milano-BIcocca, Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy; 6IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute / "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Radiation Oncology, Milan, Italy
Show Affiliations
Hide Affiliations
Purpose or Objective
Stereotactic
body radiation therapy (SBRT) is becoming the treatment of choice for oligometastatic
patients (pts) thanks to its fast delivery, low toxicity and high local control
rates. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate SBRT for
oligometastatic lymph-nodal relapses (LNM) in gynecological cancer pts in terms
of local control (LC) and toxicity.
Material and Methods
From
February 2009 to November 2020, 39 LNM in 26 pts were treated with SBRT. Five
LNM of 4 pts were treated with helical Image Guided- Intensity Modulated
Radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) to a median dose of 54 (35-63) Gy in 6 (5-10) median
fractions prescribed to 95% of the Planning Target Volume (PTV). Thirty-four
LNM of 22 pts were treated with robotic SBRT to a median dose of 36 (30-45) Gy
in a median of 5 (3-5) fractions prescribed at a median isodose of 79% (68-84%).
Seven PTVs (18%) were in the same field of previous adjuvant or salvage
radiotherapy performed with
IG-IMRT with a median dose of 53.2
Gy. The primary cancer was: ovarian in 11 pts (42.3%),
endometrial in 10 pts (38.5%), cervical cancer in 4 pts (15.4%) and fallopian tube carcinoma in 1 patient
(3.8%). Seventeen (43,6%) LNM locations were periaortic, 8 (20.5%) mediastinal, 8 (20.5%) pelvic, and 6 (15.4%)
in other sites (retroclavicular, supraclavicular,
axillary, subcostal and inguinal). Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined
by the fusion of CT and PET/CT images in whole pts. Radiological/Nuclear
Medicine imaging and clinical follow up were performed every 3 months. Toxicity
was assessed using CTCAE version 4.03 criteria.
Results
Median
follow-up was 18 months (range 2.2–75.4). All pts completed the prescribed
treatment. Nine pts
(34.6%) presented grade (G) 1-2 acute toxicity, relative to the irradiate site,
as follows: diarrhea (n=2, 7.7%), dysphagia (n=1, 3.8%),
esophagitis (n=1, 3.8%) and nausea (n=1, 3,8%). No grade ≥3 acute toxicities was observed. One patient presented late toxicity, a G2 rib pain, persistent
28 months after
the end of the treatment. A complete response was observed in 33 lesions (84.5%),
partial response in 3 lesions (7.7 %) and progressive disease in 3 lesions (7.7
%), respectively. Three pts (11.5%) had local and distant disease progression,
while 15 pts (57.7%) had distant disease progression whit local control. Two pts died at a median of 70.8 months after
the end of the treatment for progressive disease, and one patient died 8.5
months after the treatment due to a second cancer. Disease Free Survival (DFS) was
12.5 months (1.1-67.2).
Conclusion
SBRT
in oligometastatic lymph nodal relapse of gynecological tumors showed good
local control and a good toxicity profile. It might be an appealing alternative
to other invasive local therapies as surgery and could delay or avoid systemic
therapy. A longer follow up is needed to confirm these results.