Session Item

Monday
August 30
08:45 - 10:00
N101-102
State-of-the-art in lung cancer
Esther Troost, Germany;
Nicolaus Andratschke, Switzerland
3081
Symposium
Interdisciplinary
Lung lesions treated with CyberKnife: An Indian single centre experience
Ajay Sasidharan, India
PO-1190

Abstract

Lung lesions treated with CyberKnife: An Indian single centre experience
Authors:

Ajay Sasidharan1, Ramakrishna Kamath1, Pushpaja KU1, Anoop R1, Sruthi K Reddy1, Haridas Nair1, Annex E H2, Debnarayan Dutta1

1Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Radiation Oncology, Kochi, India; 2Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical Physics, Kochi, India

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

To assess outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with CyberKnife (CK) in Indian primary lung cancer and lung oligometastasis patients. 

Material and Methods

Analysis of data from a prospectively maintained database of patients with primary lung cancer and lung oligometastasis treated with SBRT on CK was done.

Results

From 2017 - 2020, 42 patients were treated with CK for lung lesion (20 primary lung & 22 lung oligometastasis). In 20 primary lung cancer patients (12 Adenocarcinoma, 6 SCC, 1 neuroendocrine,1 no biopsy) 14 male patients, mean age 70 yrs (38-90 yrs), 13 had co-morbidities, peripheral lesions 15, central lesions 5, right lung 15, left lung 5, 9 (45%) had stage I and 5 (25%) stage II. Six (30%) patients with primary lung cancer and metastasis underwent RT for both metastatic and primary site. Stage IA1, IA2, IA3, IB, IIA, IIB were 1 (5%), 3 (15%), 3 (15%), 2 (10%), 2 (10%), 3 (15%) respectively. Three (15%) were treated with 22-26Gy/1fr, 7 (35%) with 42-45Gy/3fr, 8 (40%) with 40-50Gy/5fr, 1 (5%) each with 36Gy/4fr and 48Gy/8fr. PTV mean volume 38.1 cc (8.3-88.3cc). Mean OS & PFS 14 (2-43 mo) & 8 mo (3-37 mo) respectively. At last follow up (F/U), 15 patients were alive, 3 were dead and 2 lost to F/U. In stage I and stage II disease local failure rate was 2/9 (22%) and 1/5 (20%). In primary lung with metastatic disease treated with local RT, 3/6 (50%) had local failure. Nine patients had disease progression (6 local, 3 distant). In 22 patients with 23 lung oligometastasis, 3 had synchronous and 19 had metachronous lung metastasis. Primary site colo-rectal in 9, thyroid in 3, kidney 4, head neck in 2, liver in 1, endometrium in 1, pancreas in 1, sarcoma 1. Mean age 60 yrs (36-83 yrs), 12 male patients, 7 had comorbidities. Five patients had DFI   1yr, 5 patients 1-2 yr, and 9 patients more than 2 yr. Mean PTV was 21cc (range: 2.8 – 78 cc). 18–24 Gy/1fr, 45-54Gy/3fr, 35-50Gy/1fr & 48Gy/8fr in 6, 8, 5 and 1 patient respectively. 17 patients were evaluable for ‘response to CK’ evaluation [local response 88% (15/17) with CR 76% (13/17) & PR 12% (2/17)]. 2 (12%) papillary carcinoma thyroid patients had progressive disease. At mean F/U of 11 mo, 7 (32%) were alive with controlled disease, 8 (36%) were alive with disease progression. 2 (9%) had local and distant failure and 10 (45%) had systemic progression. Mean OS & PFS 11 mo (2-26mo) and 8.5 mo (2-26mo). Median OS for synchronous oligometastasis 22 mo. At post-CK 3 mo, 1 patient required intercostal drainage and pleurodesis. Radiological complete response after CK in metastasis and primary lung cancer was 15/22 (68%) and 9/20 (45%) respectively. PTV volume (<10cc; p=0.011) and BED (>110 Gy; p=0.009) were significant factors influencing complete response to treatment. Histology (adenocarcinoma Vs SCC; p=0.416) was not significant.

Conclusion

SBRT with CK is safe and effective in both primary lung tumours and in lung oligo-metastasis. Higher BED in smaller volume metastasis had higher complete response.