Session Item

Monday
May 24
08:00 - 18:00
Mining the radiotherapy dose: exploring dose-response patterns in radiation therapy (no online session)
0040
Choice of workshop
Hypofractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer orbital lesion: a multicentric series of 35 patients
Isacco Desideri, Italy
PO-1087

Abstract

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer orbital lesion: a multicentric series of 35 patients
Authors:

Isacco Desideri1, Lucia Pia Ciccone1, Gaia Piperno2, Matteo Augugliaro2, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa3, Pierina Navarria4, Luca Dominici5, Marta Scorsetti6, Viola Salvestrini1, Giulia Riva7, Vanessa Di Cataldo8, Luca Visani8, Mauro Loi9, Icro Meattini10, Lorenzo Livi10

1University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", Florence, Italy; 2IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Division of Radiotherapy, Milan, Italy; 3University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Milan, Italy. IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Division of Radiotherapy, Milan, Italy; 4Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery department , Rozzano, Milan, Italy; 5Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery department, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; 6Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele , Milan, Italy; 7National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Radiotherapy Unit, Pavia, Italy; 8Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza, CyberKnife Center, Florence, Italy; 9Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Florence, Italy; 10University of Florence, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio". Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Florence, Italy

Show Affiliations
Purpose or Objective

Orbital metastases in breast cancer (OM-BC) patients (pts) are a rare occurrence. OM-BC are usually symptomatic with a huge impact on quality of life. Local control (LC) might be difficult to obtain because of the proximity of critical structures. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) could constitute a viable treatment for OM-BC. Here an Italian multicentric retrospective experience of Radiation Oncology Departments of AOU Careggi Florence, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS Rozzano about pts with OM-BC treated with HFRT is presented.

Material and Methods

Clinical data records of 35 pts consecutively treated for OM-BC were collected: 7 pts with (volumetric modulated arc therapy) VMAT-HFRT and 28 pts with CyberknifeR (CK) system (Figure 1). LC, objective response rate (ORR), symptoms control, treatment related toxicity according to CTCAE v5.0 and survival outcomes (PFS-OM and OS) were analyzed. Dosimetric data are reported as well.



Results

From May 2012 to January 2020, 35 treatments were performed, baseline characteristics are highlighted in Table 1. In pts treated with CK, mean prescribed dose was 2000cGy (range 1800-2400) for a mean of 3.75 fractions (range 2-5), prescribed at a mean isodose line (IDL) of 77.7% (range 71.5-80.9). In pts treated with VMAT-HFRT, a 3000cGy in 10 fractions was adopted, prescribed at the 95% IDL. Median follow-up after HFRT treatment was 19 months (IQR 5-26.7), overall response rate was 48.6%, with 13 and 4 pts presenting a partial and complete response, respectively. Mean time to the best measured response was 14.9 months (range 1-70). 7 patients were still alive, with a LC rate of 100%. We reported 2 local progression, with a mean LC rate of 13 months. Retreatment with CK after local progression was performed in 1 case. Thirty pts had symptomatic OM-BC at diagnosis: 19, 9 and 2 pts had reduced visual field, impaired visual acuity and ocular pain, respectively. Ocular motility at OM-BC diagnosis was compromised in 18 pts (51.4%). Overall, 7 pts reported improvement of symptoms after treatment. Seven pts presented acute toxicity (<3 months) after HFRT (2 diplopia G2, 2 xerophthalmia G2, 2 eyelid edema G1 and 1 floaters G1). Median PFS OM-BC was 16 months (IQR 4.2-25.7) and mean OS was 715.3 months (range 400-924). In CK cases there are 5 GTV prescriptions with a median GTV dose coverage of 96.3% (IQR 90.5-97.5), while the remaining 23 pts presented a median PTV dose coverage of 97% (IQR 94.1-98.2). In VMAT-HFRT cases median PTV dose coverage was 97% (IQR 95.2-99.7). Mean maximum dose (Dmax) to the eye globe was 2145.7cGy[b1]  (range 467-3345). Median maximum dose (Dmax) to optic nerve, optic chiasm and lens was 1791cGy (IQR 1516.7-2400.5), 335cGy (IQR 195.7-1006.5) and 286cGy (IQR 133.5-714.0), respectively. 


Conclusion

HFRT for OM-BC is a feasible and tolerable approach with significant impact on oncological and quality of life outcomes.