Abstract

Title

PSMA-PET impact on post-prostatectomy recurrencies multidisciplinary management: focus on RT

Authors

Valeria Chiofalo1, Giuseppe Carlo Iorio1, Ilaria Bonavero1, Ramona Parise1, Roberta Carlevato1, Sara Bartoncini1, Veronica Richetto2, Francesco Ceci3, Serena Grimaldi3, Sara Dall'Armellina3, Désirée Deandreis3, Beatrice Lillaz4, Marco Oderda4, Paolo Gontero4, Alessia Guarneri1, Umberto Ricardi1

Authors Affiliations

1University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy; 2University of Turin, Department of Medical Physics, Turin, Italy; 3University of Turin, Department of Medical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine, Turin, Italy; 4University of Turin, Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology, Turin, Italy

Purpose or Objective

to evaluate the impact of PSMA-PET in the management of recurrent prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy (RP), with a main focus on RT.

Materials and Methods

we retrospectively analyzed data of patients experiencing biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-RP and staged at our Center with PSMA-PET prior to any treatment. Primary endpoints were: biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) rate after any radiotherapy treatment guided by PSMA-PET (regardless of its result); and bPFS rate following any treatment. BCR was defined as PSA ³0.2 ng/ml. Secondary endpoints included: change in the treatment plan, defined as SRT abort or the addition of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to SRT, and rate of SRT abort. In patients treated exclusively with SBRT, as MDT, ADT-free survival was evaluated. Patterns of failure in patients receiving prostate-bed SRT following a negative PSMA-PET were also evaluated.

Results

95 patients with BCR following RP (pN0-pNx) staged between November 2016 and March 2019 with PSMA-PET were included in the present analysis. The median follow-up time (PSMA to the last follow-up) was 36 months (range 11-50). The median PSA at PSMA was 0.5 ng/ml (range 0.13-8.9). PSMA was positive in 26 patients (27.3%), with 31 lesions detected as shown in Table 1. The SRT abort rate was 57.6% (15 patients), as only 9 patients underwent prostate-bed SRT guided by local PSMA uptake. A change in management was observed for 17 patients (65.3%). ADT only was administred in 4 patients (15.3%). One patient underwent SBRT+ADT and 2 patients received SRT+SBRT+ADT.  Exclusive MDT approaches included salvage pelvic lymph node dissection (s-PLND) for 3 patients (11.5%) and SBRT for 7 patients (26.9%).
Fifteen out of the 26 positive patients (57.6%) treated with PSMA-guidance experienced a recurrence, with a 9 months median interval from the end of any treatment (range 1-32). Among the 7 patients treated with SBRT-only 6 recurred with a median bPFS of 15 months (range 3-30). The median interval to ADT initiation in the SBRT-only group was 8 months (ADT-free survival).

PSMA following RP was negative in 69 patients, of whom 87% (60) received SRT (with ADT in 3/60). Among the remaining PSMA-negative patients, 7 were observed and 2 received ADT-only. After SRT 13 patients (21.6%) experienced a recurrence, with a median time of 6 months (range 1-28). Sites of recurrence following SRT in PSMA negative patients are shown in Table 1. Overall, a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) in terms of bPFS (Fig. 1) was recorded between PSMA negative patients treated with SRT (± ADT; n=57 as 3 patients were lost in follow-up) and PSMA positive patients that received targeted treatments (n=24, as 2 patients were lost in follow-up).


Conclusion

a high proportion of PSMA-positive patients had an actually delivered RT plan different from the intended SRT plan. PSMA-PET negativity at first BCR following RP strongly relates to better prognosis compared with the cluster of PSMA-positive patients.