A proton pencil beam was delivered at a clinical
facility (ProBeam, Varian) to a 5mm cubic scintillating ZnSe:O crystal. The
crystal emitted visible light when irradiated by the beam. The beam delivery
was gated by optical monitoring of a marker block (RPM, Varian) on a motion
stage (Fig 1.A-B). The motion stage performed vertical sinusoidal motion with
1cm peak-to-peak amplitude and 1-8s periods. The gating window was set
approximately from the middle of the motion and above giving a duty cycle close
to 50%. A video camera (GoPro) acquired images at 120Hz showing both the
crystal and the marker block. Post-treatment the marker block position was
segmented in all video frames. A sinusoidal fit provided the times Tmax
where the marker block was at maximum excursion. Analysis of the crystal light
intensity in the video frames provided the beam-on and beam-off times for each
cycle with an estimated accuracy <2ms (Fig 1C). The latencies for gate-off (tgate-off) and gate-on (tgate-on) were then determined as
follows.
If tgate-off and tgate-on were zero, the mid-time of
the light signal (Tlight) would coincide with the time of maximum marker
block excursion Tmax. With finite latencies it can be shown that the
light signal has a delay Tlight – Tmax = (tgate-off + tgate-on)/2. The time difference
between the motion and the light signal therefore directly provided the sum of
the gate-off and gate-on latency for each monitored cycle. It can furthermore
be shown that the light signal duration (DTlight)
increases linearly with the sinusoidal period T as follows: DTlight = aT + (tgate-off - tgate-on). Here, a is the constant
fraction of time, where the RPM marker block is inside the gating window. A
linear fit of the observed light signal duration as function of the sine period
therefore provided the difference between the gate-off and gate-on latency.