Abstract

Title

A simple method to measure the latency in gated proton therapy using a scintillating crystal

Authors

Jakob Thomsen1, Esben Worm2, Jacob Johansen1, Per Rugaard3

Authors Affiliations

1Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark; 2Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus, Denmark; 3Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy , Aarhus, Denmark

Purpose or Objective

Gated delivery is commonly used in radiotherapy of tumors moving with respiration. It relies on the ability to turn on the treatment beam only when the target is within a predetermined gating window. However, the latency from the target enters/exits the gating window till the beam is turned on/off affects the treatment accuracy. No standardized method for measuring the gating latency exists. We therefore propose a simple and direct method to measure the latency and demonstrate the method for a pencil-beam scanning proton system. 

Materials and Methods

A proton pencil beam was delivered at a clinical facility (ProBeam, Varian) to a 5mm cubic scintillating ZnSe:O crystal. The crystal emitted visible light when irradiated by the beam. The beam delivery was gated by optical monitoring of a marker block (RPM, Varian) on a motion stage (Fig 1.A-B). The motion stage performed vertical sinusoidal motion with 1cm peak-to-peak amplitude and 1-8s periods. The gating window was set approximately from the middle of the motion and above giving a duty cycle close to 50%. A video camera (GoPro) acquired images at 120Hz showing both the crystal and the marker block. Post-treatment the marker block position was segmented in all video frames. A sinusoidal fit provided the times Tmax where the marker block was at maximum excursion. Analysis of the crystal light intensity in the video frames provided the beam-on and beam-off times for each cycle with an estimated accuracy <2ms (Fig 1C). The latencies for gate-off (tgate-off) and gate-on (tgate-on) were then determined as follows.

If tgate-off and tgate-on were zero, the mid-time of the light signal (Tlight) would coincide with the time of maximum marker block excursion Tmax. With finite latencies it can be shown that the light signal has a delay Tlight – Tmax = (tgate-off + tgate-on)/2. The time difference between the motion and the light signal therefore directly provided the sum of the gate-off and gate-on latency for each monitored cycle. It can furthermore be shown that the light signal duration (DTlight) increases linearly with the sinusoidal period T as follows: DTlight = aT + (tgate-off - tgate-on). Here, a is the constant fraction of time, where the RPM marker block is inside the gating window. A linear fit of the observed light signal duration as function of the sine period therefore provided the difference between the gate-off and gate-on latency.

Results

The mean of the summed gating latency tgate-off + tgate-on across 86 analyzed cycles was 396ms (Fig 2A). The gate-on latency was longer than the gate-off latency with tgate-off - tgate-on = -180ms (Fig 2B). The mean gating latencies were tgate-on = 288ms and tgate-off = 108ms (Fig 2C).

Conclusion

We propose a simple and direct method to determine the gating latency through video recording of a motion stage and a scintillating crystal placed in the beam. For the investigated proton beam, the average latency was 288 ms for beam-on and 108ms for beam-off.